Friday, August 17, 2012

Brave Brothers Speaking Out on Obama

Racist Video or What?

Can you imagine if a white president created a video announcing the 2012 launch of white people for so and so.  Or maybe a Christian president creating a video announcing the 2012 launch of Christians for so and so at Christmas time?  He says he's about bringing folks together, but brother and sisters I think he's set us all back 100 years.

California Here We Come!

Cousin Sissy does it again.  She's a badddd Sister!

Roger Hedgecock was the Mayor of San Diego for many years and now writes a column and has a Syndicated Radio Show which does very well. Worth the read.
Written by Roger Hedgecock - former mayor of San Diego
I live in California. If you were wondering what living in Obama's second term would be like, wonder no longer. We in California are living there now.

California is a one-party state dominated by a virulent Democrat Left
enabled by a complicit media where every agency of local, county, and state government is run by and for the public employee unions. The unemployment rate is 12%.

California has more folks on food stamps than any other state, has added
so many benefits and higher rates to Medicaid that we call it "Medi-Cal."
Our K-12 schools have more administrators than teachers, with smaller
classes but lower test scores and higher dropout rates with twice the
per-student budget of 15 years ago. Good job, Brownie.

This week, the once and current Gov. Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown had to confess that the "balanced" state budget adopted five months ago was billions in the red because actual tax revenues were billions lower than the
airy-fairy revenue estimates on which the balance was predicated.

After trimming legislators' perks and reducing the number of cell phones
provided to state civil servants, the governor intoned that drastic budget
reductions had already hollowed out state programs for the needy, law
enforcement and our schoolchildren. California government needed more
money.

Echoing the Occupy movement, the governor proclaimed the rich must pay their fair share. Fair share? The top 1% of California income earners
currently pays 50% of the state's income tax.

California has seven income tax brackets. The top income tax rate is 9.3%,
which is slapped on the greedy rich earning at least $47,056 a year.
Income of more than $1 million pays the "millionaires' and billionaires'"
surcharge tax rate of 10.3%. Brown's proposal would add 2% for income
over $250,000. A million-dollar income would then be taxed at 12.3%. And that's just for the state.

Brown also proposed a one-half-cent sales tax increase, which would bring sales taxes (which vary by county) up to 7.75% to as much as 10%. Both tax increases would be on the ballot in 2012.

The sales tax increase proposal immediately brought howls of protest from
the Left (of Brown!). Charlie Eaton, a sociology grad student at UC
Berkeley and leader of the UC Student-Workers Union, said, "We've paid
enough. It's time for millionaires to pay."

At least five other ballot measures to raise taxes are circulating for signatures to get on the 2012 ballot in California . The governor's proposals are the most conservative.

The Obama way doesn't end with taxes.

The governor and the state legislature continue to applaud the efforts of
the California High Speed Rail Authority to build a train connecting Los
Angeles and San Francisco . Even though the budget is three times the
voter-approved amount and the first segment will only connect two small
towns in the agricultural Central Valley . But hey, if we build it, they will
ride. And we don't want to turn down the Obama bullet-train bucks Florida and other states rejected because the operating costs would bankrupt them.

Can't happen here because we're already insolvent!

If we get into real trouble with the train, we'll just bring in the Chinese. It
worked with the Bay Bridge reconstruction. After the 1989 earthquake,
the bridge connecting Oakland and San Francisco was rebuilt with steel
made in China . Workers from China too. Paid for with money borrowed from China . Makes perfect sense.

In California , we hate the evil, greedy rich (except the rich in Hollywood,
in sports, and in drug dealing). But we love people who have broken into
California to eat the bounty created by the productive rich.

Illegals get benefits from various generous welfare programs, free medical
care, and free schools for their kids, including meals, and of course,
instate tuition rates and scholarships too. Nothing's too good for our guests.

To erase even a hint of criticism of illegal immigration, the California
Legislature is considering a unilateral state amnesty. Democrat State
Assemblyman Felipe Fuentes has proposed an initiative that would bar
deportation of illegals from California.

Interesting dilemma for Obama there. If immigration is exclusively a
federal matter, and Obama has sued four states for trying to enforce
federal immigration laws he won't enforce, what will the President do to
a California law that exempts California from federal immigration law?

California is also near fulfilling the environmentalist dream of
de-industrialization.

After driving out the old industrial base (auto and airplane assembly, for example, air and water regulators and tax policies are now driving out the high-tech, biotech and even Internet-based companies that were
supposed to be California's future.

The California cap-and-trade tax on business in the name of reducing CO2
makes our state the leader in wacky environmentalism and guarantees a
further job exodus from the state. Even green energy companies can't do
business in California . Solyndra went under, taking its taxpayer loan
guarantee with it.

No job is too small to escape the regulators. The state has even banned
weekend amateur gold miners from the historic gold mining streams in the
Sierra Nevada Mountains . In fact, more and more of California 's public
land is off-limits to recreation by the people who paid for that land. Unless
you're illegal.

Then you can clear the land, set up marijuana plantations at will, bring
in fertilizers that legal farmers can no longer use, exploit illegal farm
workers who live in hovels with no running water or sanitation, and
protect your investment with armed illegals carrying guns no California
citizen is allowed to own.

The rest of us only found out about these plantations when the workers'
open campfire started one of those devastating fires that have killed
hundreds of people and burned out thousands of homes in California over
the last decade.

It's often said that whatever happens in California will soon happen in your state.

You'd better hope that's wrong.

Roger Hedgecock

CALIFORNIA IS OBAMA’S DREAM
AND his biggest source of fund raisers!
.

What's really inside Obamacare?




This sent in by my every ready field reporter Cousin Sissy.

Curious about the Obama Care Bill? Click on the website below for the entire bill – 2409 pages. Read it yourself.
I am no fan of ObamaCare or its namesake, but "HB3200" was never passed. In fact, House bills are numbered H.R., not HB. ObamaCare is H.R. 3590. Introduced by Charles Rangel which tells you something.
The actual Act is at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3590eas/pdf/BILLS-111hr3590eas.pdf
All 2409 pages.

Please read below...
>
> Obama Care Highlighted by Page Number
> THE CARE BILL HB 3200
>
>
> JUDGE KITHIL IS THE 2ND OFFICIAL WHO HAS OUTLINED THESE PARTS OF THE CARE BILL.
> Judge Kithil of Marble Falls, TX - highlighted the most egregious pages of HB3200
> Please read this........ especially the reference to pages 58 & 59
>
>
> JUDGE KITHIL wrote:
>
> **
> Page 50/section 152: The bill will provide insurance to
> all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally.
>
> **
> Page 58 and 59: The government will have real-time access to an
> individual's bank account and will have the authority to make
> electronic fund transfers from those accounts.
>
> **
> Page 65/section 164: The plan will be subsidized (by the
> government) for all union members, union retirees and for
> community organizations (such as the Association
> of Community Organizations for Reform Now -
> ACORN).
>
> **
> Page 203/line 14-15: The tax imposed under this section
> will not be treated as a tax. (How could anybody in their
> right mind come up with that?)
>
> **
> Page 241 and 253: Doctors will all be paid the same
> regardless of specialty, and the government will set all
> doctors' fees.
>
> **
> Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ration care
> according to the patient's age.
>
> **
> Page 317 and 321: The government will impose a prohibition on
> hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an
> exception.
>
> **
> Page 425, line 4-12: The government mandates advance-care
> planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be
> required to attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every five
> years. (Death counseling..)
> i
> **
> Page 429, line 13-25: The government will specify
> which doctors can write an end-of-life order.
> HAD ENOUGH???? Judge Kithil then goes on to identify:
>
> "Finally, It is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to
> members of Congress. Members of Congress are already
> exempt from the Social Security system, and have a well-funded
> private plan that covers their retirement needs
.
If they were on
> our Social Security plan, I believe they would find a very quick
> 'fix' to make the plan financially sound for their future."
>
> -Honorable David Kithil of Marble Falls, Texas
>
.

The Statistics of Health

This sent in by my good friend and veteran John

This is quite interesting.
Very hard to deny the facts.
There are actually two messages here. The first is very interesting,
but the second is absolutely astounding- and explains a lot.
A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very interesting
Statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health
Organization.
Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:
U.S. 65%
England 46%
Canada 42%
Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment
within six months:
U.S. 93%
England 15%
Canada 43%
Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:
U.S. 90%
England 15%
Canada 43%
Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:
U.S. 77%
England 40%
Canada 43%
Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:
U.S. 71
England 14
Canada 18
And now for the last statistic:
National Health Insurance?
U.S. NO
England YES
Canada YES
Check the second set of statistics!!
The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the
private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.
You know what the private business sector is - a real-life business,
not a government job. Here are the percentages.
T. Roosevelt..................38%
Taft..............................40%
Wilson ...........................52%
Harding.........................49%
Coolidge........................48%
Hoover ...........................42%
F. Roosevelt...................50%
Truman..........................50%
Eisenhower.....................57%
Kennedy.........................30%
Johnson..........................47%
Nixon..............................53%
Ford................................42%
Carter..............................32%
Reagan............................56%
G.H.W. Bush.....................51%
Clinton ..............................39%
G.W. Bush........................55%
Obama...............................8%
This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration: only 8%
of them have ever worked in private business!
That's right! Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the last 19
presidents! And these people are trying to tell our big corporations
how to run their business?
How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the
most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about
business when he's never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has
never really had one? And when it's the same for 92% of his senior
staff and closest advisers? They've spent most of their time in
academia, government and/or non-profit jobs or as "community
organizers." They should have been in an employment line.
Pass this on because we'll NEVER see these facts in the main stream media.